A Semiology of Physical Education
Abstract
Semiotics and its disciplinary field is enough and rich to seek discussions within the framework of Physical Education. The study of Physical Education can feed on the review of its syntagmas, its meanings and the praxis of education professionals. Supported by semiotic and semioanthropological study processes, the interpretive and significant capacity of the physical educator can mature by making explicit mechanisms of action and meaning in the meeting of both disciplines to offer other panoramas of imagination, thought and action in increasingly uncertain scenarios and complex for physical educators. Semiology offers opportunities to seek a meta-rationality that is little developed in the physical educator, from its incorporation, explanation and study approach, opening new problematizations and approaches for Education in general and Physical Education in particular.
References
Ananias, E.V., de Souza Neto, S., y Benites, L.C. (2022). The training of physical education teachers in Portugal, the USA, and Brazil from the perspective of professionalization of teaching during the practicum. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30(21). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.6654
Barthes, R. (2009). La aventura semiológica. Ediciones Paidós.
Buyssens, E. (1967). La comunication et l'articulation linguistique. Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles.
Eco, U. (1999). La Estructura Ausente: Introducción a la Semiótica (F. Serra Cantarell, Trad.). Lumen Editora Ltda.
Fabbri, P. (2000). El giro semiótico: las concepciones del signo semiótico (J. Vivanco Gefaell, Trad.). Gedisa Editorial.
Foucault, M. (2009). El orden del discurso. Tusquets Editores.
Galindo Cáceres, J. (2011). Ingeniería en comunicación social y deporte. Instituto de Altos Estudios sobre Deporte Cultura y Sociedad A.C. (INDECUS A.C.).
Gripay, B., André, T., De Laval, M., Peneau, B., Secourgeon, A., Lerolle, N., Annweiler, C., Justeau, G., Connan, L., Martin, L., y Bière, L. (2022). Benefits of semiology taught using near-peer tutoring are sustainable. BMC Med Educ. 22, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03086-9
Halliday, M.A.K. (1982). El lenguaje como semiótica social. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Landowski, E. (1993). La sociedad figurada: ensayos de sociosemiótica. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Legardera Otero, F., y Lavega Burgués, P. (2003). Introducción a la praxiología motriz. Editorial Paidotribo.
Morin, E. (2000). La mente bien ordenada: repensar la reforma, reformar el pensamiento. Editorial Seix Barral.
Murfay, K., Beighle, A., Erwin, H. y Aiello, E. (2022). Examining high school student perceptions of physical education. European Physical Education Review, 17(3), 704-719, https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X211072860
Pérez Martínez, H. (1995). En pos del signo: introducción a la semiótica. El Colegio de Michoacán.
Pierce, C. (1974). La ciencia de la semiótica. Ediciones Nueva Visión.
tudn.com (2020, julio 15). La Liga MX genera más de 5 mil millones de dólares al año. tudn Liga MX. https://www.tudn.com/futbol/liga-mx/la-liga-mx-genera-mas-5-mil-millones-de-dolares-al-ano
Tsangaridou, N., Pieroua, M., Kyriakides, E. y Charalambous, C.Y. (2021). Teaching physical education in early years: Focusing on teachers’ practices. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 41(2), 278-287. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0294
Verón, E. (1987). La semiosis social: fragmentos de una teoría de la discursividad. Editorial Gedisa.
Copyright (c) 2023 Lecturas: Educación Física y Deportes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
